Manufacturers don’t always grasp the complexity, technicality or scope of information for substantiating claims. There are numerous categories of claims, and each category can have its own individualized requirements and requirement latitude. The requirements around claims are varied and depend on the type of claim. Categories include:
Nutrient content claims:
Consumer value claims (label claims of consumer concern):
Structure/function claims that convey:
These categories can contain subcategories, each with its own requirements. Here’s an example of both claim specificity and latitude, in the category of nutrient content claims:
Specificity: There are requirements about the specific words a manufacturer may use, particularly around quantifiable claims such as “high in,” “rich in” and “contains.” Saying “low” is not the same as saying “less,” but saying “reduced” is the same as saying “less.”
Latitude: While the words themselves are closely watched, the format of those words is often given a great deal of leeway. A claim may be presented in a font size or style on the label which is more than twice as prominent as the rest of the product’s identity style.
When building a case to substantiate health claims, the study details matter. Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) apply a claim substantiation standard of “competent and reliable scientific evidence.” They look at the meaning of the claim being made, with an eye toward:
FDA and FTC closely scrutinize the studies being used to support the claim. Is the study test substance the same as the product dietary ingredient? Is the form the same (e.g. extract vs. powder)? If it is a botanical, is the part of the plant the same? Is the dosage in the study similar to or conservative when compared to the serving size of the product? What about the length of exposure of the study test subjects vs. the recommended use of the product? Are there any other ingredients present in the study that could have contributed to the effect?
Companies often focus primarily on FDA regulatory compliance, while not paying enough attention to FTC requirements around claims. But even the highest quality product cannot reach the market if it does not comply with the business law of the land. The FDA’s focus is on manufacturing and labeling. The FTC enforces laws against “unfair or deceptive acts or practices” in advertising. Law enforcement action applies not only to product labels, but also to internet, print, broadcast, infomercials and catalogs. The lines between the jurisdiction of each agency are not black and white, and they often collaborate on the same case against a company. FTC enforcement actions can have a devastating impact on ad agencies, distributors, retailers, catalog companies and infomercial producers. Unlike your facility, your advertising and social media is public-facing and accessible. Complaints filed with the Better Business Bureau can make their way to the FTC. Warning letters are only one mechanism for action. FTC action can also involve lawsuits, frozen assets, burdensome nonnegotiable settlement demands and court orders. As the FTC has said, “Generally, products related to consumer health or safety require a relatively high level of substantiation.”