NSF 350 - Evaluation of Log Reduction Targets

Some states and local jurisdictions have already mandated evaluation of these systems using a risk-based framework, including the state of Colorado, and the cities of San Francisco, CA and Austin, TX. Further, California, Washington, Alaska, Hawaii, and Minnesota are progressing toward adoption of similar regulations or policies with Texas, Ohio, Oregon and Alaska eyeing similar steps in that direction.
Risk-based frameworks for the evaluation of onsite non-potable water systems is based on a log reduction target and crediting system. Log reduction is a mathematical expression of the relative number of organisms eliminated by given treatment system. A 1 log10 reduction indicates inactivation of 90% of target microbes, a 2 log10 reduction indicates 99% removal, a 3 log10 reduction indicates 99.9% reduction, and so on.
Risk-based frameworks used to evaluate onsite non-potable water reuse systems specify minimum log-reduction targets (LRTs) for pathogen removal based on the source water type and proposed end-use applications. Log reduction credits (LRCs) are assigned for each specific process used in the treatment train based on the validated log-reduction capability of the individual process and the ability to continuously monitor surrogate parameters for ongoing system performance. To demonstrate adequate treatment and public health protection, the sum of the LRCs must meet or exceed the specified LRTs required.
NSF/ANSI 350 has been updated to include optional criteria that incorporate a risk-based framework using log-reduction targets (LRTs) and log-reduction credits (LRCs). The updates are aligned with the recommendations from the National Blue-Ribbon Commission on Onsite Non-Potable Water Systems and are a component of EPA’s Water Reuse Action Plan (Action 2.18). NSF can evaluate onsite non-potable water systems according to this framework and verify that systems meet the minimum log reduction targets for pathogen reduction as specified for its applicable end use. These optional criteria apply to commercial and multi-family systems only and systems must additionally comply with the standard requirements in NSF/ANSI 350, including product testing.
Systems that are evaluated and found to be compliant with these optional criteria will be authorized to bear an endorsement on their product marking and public product listing.
Learn more about NSF/ANSI 350
How NSF Can Help You

What’s New with NSF

iNADO Partners with NSF to Support Members and Athletes
May 27, 2026iNADO is pleased to welcome NSF’s expertise and experience in support of its members and the athletes they serve
NSF Ends UK’s Three-Year Testing Gap with REG 31 Testing Designation
May 20, 2026NSF’s Oakdale laboratory becomes the UK’s sole facility offering comprehensive BS 6920 and REG 31 testing, closing a critical drinking water safety gap.
Tangent® Materials Announces Industry First: Tangent PolySheet™ CB Earns Certification to NSF 537, Becoming the First PFAS-Free NSF Standard 51 Food Equipment Material
May 20, 2026New food-grade synthetic cutting-board sheet, engineered from the ground up without per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), establishes a new materialsafety benchmark for food-contact and food-equipment applications.
NSF Expands Food Equipment Portfolio with Electrical Safety Testing and Certification
April 30, 2026Manufacturers now have a “one-stop-shop” for both sanitation and electrical safety certification, enabling market expansion and regulatory compliance.
